fluidizer

As the world of industrial manufacturing becomes more sophisticated and refined, we are seeing more choices in the types of equipment offered, especially in the area of industrial mixers. Those responsible for researching and purchasing new industrial equipment are generally those at high corporate levels, as this kind of decision-making is a huge responsibility. Industrial equipment is a high-cost purchase, and the equipment must be right for the job and last for the long term. All of this is why it pays to really do some hard thinking and evaluating of choices before investing in a new mixer.

Many Choices Available in Mixers and Blenders

Today, as technology has created new refinements in equipment, we see more choices available in blenders and more pros and cons for different choices. As with any major purchase, it’s important to really take a serious assessment of your company’s needs, and what is possible on the available budget. While some mixers might seem like a “great deal” as they are offered at a lower price, the reality is that sometimes you really do get what you pay for, and it’s smarter in the long run to pay for real quality items from a reputable manufacturer, even if it is priced higher.
The different styles of mixers out there today offer different capabilities. Rotary drum blenders aren’t seen as much in the US but may increase in popularity over time. These mixers can mix materials quickly and thoroughly, and since they do not have moving parts inside the drum (unlike ribbon or paddle blenders) they don’t run the risk of shearing off materials on a blade during mixing. These blenders are also smaller in size, and they use less energy to run. These are all real assets that can make this type of blender a solid choice.

Fluidizers are another type of blender than is seen less in industry in the US, but they again may catch on more in the future. A fluidizer is a very efficient type of mixer, and can offer better results than avribbon or paddle blender.

Yes, there is a lot to consider when a company has to invest in equipment, which is why it’s smart to take the time to review your options thoroughly before making that major financial commitment. So, do the research carefully, and remember, “you get what you pay for!”

SAP Insights: 2017’s historic Battle for No.1

The Chase for No.1 dominated the headlines in 2017, with three new World No.1s crowned in a season that saw five women hold the top spot. SAP Tennis Analytics looks into a history-making year atop the rankings.

The Battle for No.1 kicked off right out of the gates in January and came down to the wire in the final week of the season in Singapore. In a year that saw Angelique Kerber begin at No.1 and Serena Williams return to the WTA’s penthouse after winning her record-breaking 23rd major at the Australian, 2017 was also the first time three new No.1s were crowned in a single season. This is just the second time since the inception of computer rankings in 1975, that five different players held the top spot over the course of a year.

Karolina Pliskova became the first woman to represent the Czech Republic to become the 23rd WTA No.1 after Wimbledon. Garbiñe Muguruza became the 24th woman and second Spanish woman to hold No.1 after the US Open.

But it was Simona Halep who edged out the field in the end, becoming the 25th player and first Romanian to hold the WTA No.1 ranking after the China Open. She went on to hold her lead through Singapore to become the 13th player to finish the season at No.1. The last time a season saw even two new No.1s crowned was  2008, when Ana Ivanovic and Jelena Jankovic made their No.1 debuts.

The trend of new No.1s was not confined to the singles game. Five women held the No.1 doubles ranking as well in 2017, with three new No.1s crowned. Bethanie Mattek-Sands overtook the No.1 spot from Sania Mirza, after the two teamed up in the first week of the season and won Brisbane. Mattek-Sands’ good friend and partner Lucie Safarova moved to No.1 after Cincinnati, putting the Czech flag atop both the singles and doubles rankings for the first time.

And Martina Hingis finished off her incredible career with one of her best seasons, rising to No.1 with Chan Yung-jan to cap off a wild season of doubles. Chan became the second woman from Chinese Taipei to hold the No.1 doubles spot.

WEEKS AS WTA WORLD NO.1 IN 2017

18 weeks: Angelique Kerber (GER)
10 weeks: Serena Williams (USA)
12 weeks: Simona Halep (ROU)
8 weeks: Karolina Pliskova (CZE)
4 weeks: Garbiñe Muguruza (ESP)

WTA YEAR-END NO.1s:

Chris Evert: 1975, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1981
Martina Navratilova: 1978, 1979, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986
Stefanie Graf: 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1993, 1994, 1995 (shared with Seles), 1996
Monica Seles: 1991, 1992, 1995 (shared with Graf)
Martina Hingis: 1997, 1999, 2000
Lindsay Davenport: 1998, 2001, 2004, 2005
Serena Williams: 2002, 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015
Justine Henin: 2003, 2006, 2007
Jelena Jankovic: 2008
Caroline Wozniacki: 2010, 2011
Victoria Azarenka: 2012
Angelique Kerber: 2016
Simona Halep: 2017

[“Source-wtatennis”]

Soaking up insights in fisheries sector

Image result for Soaking up insights in fisheries sectorTHE Institute of Engineering and Technology (IET) Brunei yesterday conducted a technical visit to a fish farm operated by Syarikat Hajah Rosni binti Haji Kassim dan Anak-Anak at Kaingaran Island near Kampong Pengkalan Sibabau.

They were welcomed and briefed by the owner of the fish farm, Haji Bakar bin Haji Chuchu.

The business operates 117 fish cages over a one-hectare area. The different types of fish farmed there include sea bass,

grouper, red snapper, yellow-spotted trevally and green mussels. Last year, the company produced 13 metric tonnes of barramundi, grouper, and other types of fish, as well as green clams, for the local market.

The aim of the visit was to give the delegation an insight on how the different types of fish in the local industry are being farmed and produced before being made available in the local market and even for export purposes.

According to the Ministry of Primary Resources and Tourism, the company has the potential to produce up to 536 metric tonnes of fish in a year in 2020.

The delegation was briefed and given the opportunity to witness how operations at the fish farm were conducted, giving them valuable insights and a memorable experience.

Several members said the visit gave them the opportunity to be acquainted with the development achieved by the country in the fisheries sector.

A group photo of the Institute of Engineering and Technology (IET) Brunei delegation during the visit to the fish farm operated by Syarikat Hajah Rosni binti Haji Kassim dan Anak-Anak. – IET BRUNEI

 

[“Source-borneobulletin”]

Gujarat Election Insights: Why the fight in north Gujarat will be a tough one for BJP

Supporters wear mask of PM Modi during an election campaign rally in support of BJP candidates, in Sanand. (PTI File Photo)Supporters wear mask of PM Modi during an election campaign rally in support of BJP candidates, in Sanand. (PTI File Photo)
Unlike south and central Gujarat, the story is different in north Gujarat, here the Congress fared better than the BJP in the 2012 assembly elections. Of the 32 seats in the region, the Congress won 17 seats, two more than the BJP.

Can the BJP fare better this time? An analysis of how north Gujarat voted in the 2012 assembly elections coupled with the new political forces in the state throw some insights in what to expect this time round.

2012 Assembly Results: Victory Margins In North Gujarat

north gujarat (1)

First, the Patel factor: Patels are a prominent community in north Gujarat and unlike south and central Gujarat, they have given Hardik Patel and his Patidar agitation unprecedented support. That’s a traditional BJP vote that can be expected to move away.

Next the Thakor vote. Thakors, who comprise of about half the OBC population in the state, are concentrated in north Gujarat. The rise of Alpesh Thakor and his joining hands with the Congress is again expected to influence polling in several north Gujarat districts like Sabarkantha, Banaskantha, Kheda, Mehsana, Anand, Patan, Gandhinagar and Aravalli.

How The Thakor’s Voted In North Gujarat In 2012

thakor

Third, the Dalit vote. Mehsana is Jignesh Mevani’s home ground – his family originates from Meu village in the district. Further, Mevani, is contesting as an independent from Vadgam, a reserved seat for scheduled castes (SCs), in Banaskantha district, and has open support from Congress. Both the Dalit vote and the OBC vote can be expected to move his way giving a further boost to the Congress in north Gujarat.

The fourth deciding factor will be tribal seats in north Gujarat. It almost entirely voted for the Congress in 2012. Though BJP has been going all out to woo them, this is unlikely that a shift will be able to swing the vote their way.

Finally, unlike 2012, in 2017 there is no Gujarat Parivartan Party (GPP) to split the votes.

What does this translate to? Expect a prickly battle, but chances are that new alliances may help the Congress strengthen its presence here.
[“Source-timesofindia”]