The next iPhone reportedly starts offevolved with two times the garage

Reuters/Regis Duvignau
Apple maintained that a 16GB iPhone turned into enough last 12 months, however the enterprise might be singing a exclusive song in 2016. A Wall Avenue Magazine supply claims that The subsequentiPhone will start with 32GB of garage — at final, buyers of the bottom model may not must be pretty so thrifty with their unfastened space. That kind of access ability is a ways from new, of course (HTC, LG, Samsung and others have had 32GB starters for a while), however it is going to be more than welcome if you prefer iPhones and can’t justify greater pricey variations.

It’s going to definitely sense past due for a few. Apple started out providing 16GB base iPhones againin 2009, with the 3GS. That was cavernous on the time, but it gradually became a tighter and tighterhealthy as apps and media collections grew large. in case you capture 4K video on the iPhone 6s or SE, it chews up 375MB per minute — a 16GB tool consumer may want to effortlessly run out of room.

The following question: what about other capacities? The insider doesn’t say (and Apple definitely isn’t always commenting), but it wouldn’t be sudden if the brand new iPhone doubled the better storagestages to 128GB and 256GB. Notice how the iPad Seasoned‘s options soar instantly from 32GB to 128GB and 256GB? Even as we would not rule out a distinct strategy, it might be consistent if the iPhone had the same garage picks as its larger-screened siblings.

Intel Compute Stick evaluation (2016): 2d time’s the appeal

I had excessive hopes for Intel’s original Compute Stick, but it ended up being a big disappointment.positive, it turned into cool to have a totally functional computer the scale of some thumb drives.however it became tremendously sluggish and constrained in some sincerely baffling ways (most effective one USB port?!). Now with Intel’s second-gen Compute Stick ($159), it’s some other story may look similar, but it packs in enough upgrades — a faster processor, better networking and extraUSB ports — to actually make it a usable computer.
Intel’s new Compute Stick bundles pretty much the whole thing you would want for a basic computerinto a compact, inexpensive package.And in contrast to its predecessor, it works.

the first Compute Stick felt like a prototype that left Intel’s labs earlier than designers ever laid their eyes on it. This new version, then again, appears and looks like a solid piece of customer package. as opposed to a run of the mill rectangular layout, it has smooth curves and perforated openings for its tiny fanatics(previously they gave the look of cheap fan grilles molded into plastic).

although it‘s a device that’ll frequently live in the back of video display units, it is also supposed to beportable, so being attractive is a plus, as you are bound to reveal it off. It feels extra solid in your hand,thanks to a tasteful stability of matte and smooth plastic. Heck, even the position of the Intel interiorbrand appears higher (it is now lower at the tool in preference to in the middle and has much lessgarish coloring).

Intel has additionally covered USB ports this time around (considered one of them USB three.0), so youcan join a keyboard and mouse with out resorting to a hub. (in case you had been one of the readers whothought i used to be being unfair via complaining approximately the primary version‘s unmarried USB port, that is why. it’s now not as if Intel couldn’t suit in another port the first time around, and a USB hubtype of defeats the purpose of this kind of compact tool!) I tested the Compute stick with a wi-fi keyboard and mouse, so I simplest needed to use one of the USB ports for a wi-fi dongle. but the greater port got here in on hand for transferring documents and updating the BIOS with out getting rid of my enterdevices.

once more, the Compute Stick functions a microSD slot for an additional 128GB of garage (on top of the 32GB of internal storage). there is additionally a micro-USB port for the power adapter. you continue toneed to plug it into an AC adapter, unfortunately, which makes it a tad less transportable than it may seemin the beginning. An Intel spokesperson said the organisation is looking into the SuperMHL fashionable,which could power future fashions totally over HDMI. A small energy button lives on the side of the Compute Stick, and this time round there’s a small cap to shield the HDMI connector. That must make itless dangerous to chuck it for your bag or pocket.

if your HDMI ports are too crowded on your tv or reveal, Intel has also packed in a small HDMI extensioncord to offer the Compute Stick a bit of breathing room.

Setup and performance

putting in the Compute Stick became a cinch: I plugged it into my tv, connected the energy adapter and plugged inside the wireless dongle for my keyboard and mouse. It booted up immediately, and it tookapproximately four mins for me to run via the initial home windows 10 setup method. After a reboot, it took any other 5 mins to plug in my home windows login details and wait for my consumer account to bake. that may seem a tad lengthy, however it’s on par with what i have visible while putting in differentAtom-based totally computer systems.

Intel Compute Stick (2016) (1.4GHz Atom x5-Z8300) 2,419 2,677 E610 / P382 ninety two MB/s (reads); 176 MB/s (writes)
Intel Compute Stick (2015) (1.3GHz Atom Z3735F, Intel HD images) 2,320 1,544 E266 / P173 seventy sevenMB/s (reads); a hundred seventy five MB/s (writes)
Microsoft surface three (1.6GHz Atom x7-Z8700, Intel HD graphics) 2,839 three,920 E941 / P552 163 MB/s (reads); 39.2 MB/s (writes)
HP stream eleven (2.16GHz Intel Celeron N2840, Intel HD pics) 2,607 N/A E374 168 MB/s (reads); seventy two MB/s (writes)
once I hit the computing device, I straight away unfolded Microsoft facet and then YouTube to test the Compute Stick’s media capabilities. It loaded 1080p streams a ways faster than the previous version,though there was a piece of slowdown as I swapped between fulldisplay and windowed views. but, feeling a bit cheeky, I additionally played some 4K streams and was surprised to see the Compute Stickhandling them simply first-class. sometimes it’d get stuck on a body and then trap itself back up, but the reality that it was able to load and play 4K without any buffering or most important slowdown remainsnotable. Of direction, the Compute Stick’s 1.44GHz Atom x5-z8300 processor became quite an awful lotmaxed out at the same time as gambling 4K, but it truly is now not terribly unexpected.

After suffering through gradual download speeds with the unique Compute Stick, i was amazed to seethat the brand new version doesn’t have any trouble bringing down massive 4K documents. it really ismainly because of stepped forward networking hardware: a 2×2 antenna array and 802.11ac WiFi help.the primary Compute Stick only had a unmarried WiFi antenna, which confined its general pace andadditionally made it tough to both down load and add records at the identical time.

Emboldened through its YouTube overall performance, I started the usage of the Compute Stick as i would a standard laptop. I loaded numerous browsers with multiple tabs; opened a couple ofapplications within the heritage, which include Spotify and Slack; and proceeded to head approximatelymy regular workflow. And, pretty, the experience wasn’t half awful. The Compute Stick slowed down a chunk as I speedy alt-tabbed among programs or streamed Spotify music while downloading hugedocuments; however whilst the primary version felt too gradual for comfort, this one certainly feelscomfy.

It wasn’t lengthy earlier than I felt the limits of its confined 2GB of RAM, though. while that was once all you wanted for a respectable computing revel in, in recent times browsers and maximum internet pagesdevour up reminiscence fast. hopefully subsequent yr Intel may be capable of encompass 4GB of RAM in its base Compute Stick (this 12 months‘s upcoming faster fashions all consist of 4GB of RAM).

because the benchmarks display, this Compute Stick is substantially quicker in terms of 3-d. And whileits PCMark 7 score is best marginally quicker, I wouldn’t fear too much approximately that. realglobaloverall performance matters plenty more to me than benchmark numbers, and doing pretty mucheverything on the Compute Stick felt considerably quicker than it did with ultimate yr‘s version. the brand new version even managed to play a few simple games, like Hotline Miami 2 and Undertale, which theoriginal version could not even contact.

One capacity trouble for a few: The Compute Stick’s tiny fan made itself regarded while i used to bejogging benchmarks, even though it become about 12 feet far from me in my dwelling room.fortuitously, I failed to pay attention it lots throughout regular usage. but it is no longer the type ofdevice i’d depart strolling high-load responsibilities (or as a minimum, as tons as you could make the Atom x5 do) in my bed room overnight.

mostly i’m inspired with the aid of just how versatile the new Compute Stick occurs to be. it is extra thaneffective enough for kiosks and computer labs, however it may additionally be a stable cheap hometheater computer. i used to be capable of get entry to community stocks on my laptop and play lower back HD video files without any problem.

Configuration alternatives and the competition

This year, Intel is not going to provide a less expensive version of the Compute Stick (final 12 months,there was a Linux-targeted model for $110 with a 8GB of garage and 1GB of RAM), however that looks as if a wise preference. alternatively, the company is going a piece higher give up.

Upcoming Compute Stick models will encompass center M3 and core M5 processors for $399 and $499, respectively. additionally they p.c. in 4GB of RAM, because of this we should count on overall performance alongside the strains of slower Ultrabooks, and 3 USB ports (two on the energy adapter). Intel says each models can spit out 4K video at 30Hz, and the core M5 model (which does not include an OS) additionally includes its vPro hardwarestage safety generation. Of direction, they don’t providethe same amount of cost because the inexpensive $159 version, however i’m still intrigued to peer howlots electricity Intel can stuff into this tiny case. you may guess we’ll placed them via their paces whilethey’re to be had.

You is probably tempted to seize final 12 months‘s Compute Stick at an excellent cheaper fee or the (nearly identical) Lenovo Ideacentre Stick for round $100, but i would advise towards that, until youexperience torturing yourself. There are also a handful of other pc sticks available, but maximum of them use slower CPUs than the brand new Compute Stick. if you need a simple stick for internet surfing, the $85 ASUS Chromebit will allow you to deliver Chrome OS to any display. (I failed to consist of this inside the benchmark table, however the new Compute Stick clocked in a 550ms SunSpider browser check scorewhilst running edge, in comparison with the Chromebit’s slower rating of 780ms score. Do with that whatyou may.)


nicely, Intel did it. The Compute Stick bundles just about the whole thing you’d want for a primary laptopright into a compact, inexpensive package, and unlike its predecessor, it really works. it’s no marvel we named it one in all our exceptional of CES finalists this 12 months. if you have a spare display layingaround, you can without problems turn that into a system for your children or a few kind of householdkiosk. And irrespective of how you operate it, it will make you rethink your belief of what a laptop can be.

Infibeam’s Rs450 crore IPO subscribed 0.63 times on Day 2

A file photo of founder Vishal Mehta. The Ahmedabad-based e-tailer, which aims to raise Rs450 crore from the share sale, has run into problems with two of the four domestic investment banks opting out on concerns over pricing and timing of the issue.

A file photo of founder Vishal Mehta. The Ahmedabad-based e-tailer, which aims to raise Rs450 crore from the share sale, has run into problems with two of the four domestic investment banks opting out on concerns over pricing and timing of the issue.

Mumbai: Infibeam Incorporation Ltd, the first Indian e-commerce firm to go public, saw its initial public offering (IPO) issue being subscribed 0.63 times on the second day of the share sale on Tuesday, data from National Stock Exchange (NSE) showed.

The qualified institutional buyers’ portion was subscribed 0.47 times. The portion reserved for high networth individuals (HNIs) was filled 1.4 times, while the retail portion was subscribed 0.67 times.

The Ahmedabad-based e-tailer, which aims to raise Rs.450 crore from the share sale, has run into problems with two of the four domestic investment banks opting out on concerns over pricing and timing of the issue.

Kotak Mahindra Capital and ICICI Securities withdrew as bankers to the issue. SBI Capital Markets Ltd and Elara Capital (India) Pvt. Ltd are the two bankers managing the offer currently. The issue closes on Wednesday.

There were no anchor investors to the issue, and market participants said that it was again because of the pricing. Infibeam has fixed a price band of Rs.360-432 per share for its public offer.

The company, founded by former Amazon executive Vishal Mehta, turned profitable in the first six months of 2015-16. Infibeam posted a revenue of Rs.171.3 crore and a net profit ofRs.6.6 crore for the six months ended September 2015. It reported a revenue of Rs.288.2 crore at a net loss of Rs.9.8 crore for the year ended 31 March 2015.

After the stock exchange listing, Infibeam will be valued atRs.2,250 crore, Mehta had said at a press conference earlier this month


Practo FY15 revenue up by more than 10 times, losses widen 30%

Bengaluru: Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd, the most funded homegrown healthcare start-up, posted a more than 10-fold increase in revenue for the year ended 31 March, while losses increased 30%, signalling the company’s intent to extend its lead over smaller rivals.

Practo’s revenue increased to Rs.29.73 crore in fiscal 2015 from Rs.2.30 crore a year earlier, while the company incurred a loss of Rs.12.85 crore until March, as againstRs.9.88 crore in the year-ago period, according to documents filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC).

The company’s expenses grew more than three times, from Rs.12.19 crore in fiscal 2014 to Rs.42.59 crore, while revenue grew more than 10 times, which, according to industry experts imply that the company has a stable business model in place.

“Businesses thrive only if revenue grows faster than expenses. Yes, there are losses. But, if revenue grows faster than expenses, at some point in time the company has the potential to become a profitable business,” said Rutvik Doshi, director at Inventus Capital Partners, a venture capital firm.

Employee benefits, which surged three times to Rs.25.8 crore in fiscal 2015, comprised more than half of the firm’s expenses, the documents showed.

Practo did not respond to an email seeking comment.

India is home to at least 140 start-ups in the doctor-booking and practice management software segment, according to Tracxn, a company which provides data on start-ups. Practo is by far the largest in the category, with the company claiming to have about 200,000 doctors, 5,000 diagnostic centres and 8,000 hospitals on its platform.

For instance, smaller rival Qikwell Technologies Pvt. Ltd, which was bought by Practo in September, posted a loss of Rs.3.61 crore on revenue of Rs.51.29 lakh in fiscal 2015, according to RoC filings. Tiger Global Management-backed Lybrate Inc. is another well-capitalized start-up in the segment.

Practo had raised $34 million from institutional investors until March, while Qikwell had about $3 million and Lybrate raised $1.2 million by then.

Practo went on to raise another $90 million in August from leading investors such as China’s Tencent, Belgian venture capital firm Sofina, Google Capital, Altimeter Capital, Sequoia Capital and Yuri Milner, founder of Russian venture capital firm DST Global. Lybrate raised another $10 million in July.

Experts believe that losses may surge in the near future, given that Practo has invested in multiple acquisitions, besides spending on international expansion, launching more categories and brand promotion since April. It entered the beauty and wellness segment in early December by aggregating spas, salons and fitness centres.

“In the short term, I would expect the expenses to balloon. It makes sense to pump in a lot of money at this juncture and capture the adjacent markets. In a year or two, they can again accelerate and the cost will be recovered,” said Doshi.

Practo, which was founded in 2008 by Shashank N.D. and Abhinav Lal, started out as a product firm, providing practice management software for doctors on a software-as-a-service model. Called Practo Ray, the product remains the key revenue generator for Practo. The firm also earns revenue from Practo Reach, a sponsored listing service for hospitals and clinics. It does not charge doctors for listing on Practo, while searching is free for consumers.

To be sure, Practo had acquired hospital information management solution provider Insta Health Solutions for $12 million in September in an attempt to boost revenue. At the time of the acquisition, Insta Health Solutions had over 500 hospitals as clients in 15 nations across South-east Asia, West Asia and Africa using its information management software.

Its acquisition of Qikwell, which has expertise in appointment scheduling at hospitals, helped Practo penetrate deeper into the enterprise segment, especially hospitals, clinics and diagnostic centres. Additionally, Practo had acquired product outsourcing firm Genii in July and Delhi-based health and fitness solutions firm Fitho Wellness Services Pvt. Ltd in April.