“We can play anything”: a conversation with Satoko Fujii on creative determination and the musical self

Image result for "We can play anything": a conversation with Satoko Fujii on creative determination and the musical self


An interview and demonstration with Satoko Fujii
In conversation with Alister Spence

‘Unpredictable, wildly creative, and uncompromising…Fujii is an absolutely essential listen for anyone interested in the future of jazz.’ 
– Dan McClenaghan, All About Jazz

For virtuoso Japanese pianist and composer Satoko Fujii, the search for musical identity has been a long journey. Training in classical piano from an early age constrained her improvisational urge to ‘just hit things’ on the piano, to explore sounds in themselves. Later studies in jazz at Berklee College of Music, Boston, reinforced her view that following conventional approaches to improvisation and composition was creatively inauthentic. During further advanced studies at the New England Conservatory, pianist and improviser Paul Bley encouraged Fujii to pursue her musical ideas however inchoate they might have initially seemed. From then on Fujii followed her intuition unwaveringly and created sounds that she liked – ‘violations’, as she calls them. The determination to forge her own creative path has produced music that has brought international critical acclaim.

In this lecture demonstration, Fujii will reflect on the importance of curiosity and determination in creative development vis-à-vis the notion of talent. Allied to this is the discussion of the developmental relationship between personal musical expression, formal training and cultural background as exemplified by her engagement with Okinawan music and min’yo vocal styles. Fujii’s broader vision is of a vibrant, multi-faceted, and multi-dimensional music community, one that champions individual endeavour and a commitment to the creative self.

Read more about the Roger Covell Fellowship

On the night:
7pm – 7.30pm – Drinks in the foyer of Io Myers Studio with Satoko Fujii and Natsuki Tamura
7.30pm –  8.30pm – Interview and demonstration with Satoko Fujii and Alister Spence

Finding us
Io Myers Studio is located at the entrance to Gate 2 High St, Kensington. Look for the Creative Practice Lab neon sign in our foyer windows.

There is limited parking in the Gate 2 area around Io Myers Studio but free parking is available from 6:30pm in the car park next to NIDA accessed through Day Ave.

More information on getting to UNSW.
Download a campus map.  (PDF)

The ‘Imagine Meeting you Here: Fujii/Spence performance, education, recording project’ is supported by the Australian Government through the Australia-Japan Foundation of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.


money For not anything? Swiss Vote On basic profits For All

Money For Nothing? Swiss Vote On Basic Income For All

“The concept is noble, but I do not think our society can have enough money it nowadays,” Stephane Szeless, a forty five12 monthsantique civil servant in Geneva, advised AFP in advance of Sunday’s vote.
GENEVA, SWITZERLAND: In a international first, the Swiss voted Sunday on a thorough thought to offerthe entire population with sufficient money to stay on, no strings connected.

In a measure nearly certain to fail, electorate are being requested whether or not they want all Swissresidents, together with foreigners who have been felony residents in Switzerland for as a minimum fiveyears, to receive an unconditional fundamental earnings, or UBI.

Polling stations in most locations opened at 10:00 am (0800 GMT) and had been set to shut at midday,but the majority within the rich Alpine state vote earlier.

In Geneva for instance, 47.four percentage of eligible electorate had already solid their ballot Saturdaynighttime, according to the regional voting carrier.

Supporters of the UBI initiative say offering such an earnings might assist combat poverty and inequality in a world wherein accurate jobs with regular salaries are getting more difficult to find.

The concept is debatable, to mention the least. The Swiss authorities and nearly all of the u . s . a .‘s political parties have advised citizens to reject the initiative — recommendation which seventy onepercentage are willing to follow, according to the brand new opinion ballot .

Critics have slammed the initiative as “a Marxist dream”, warning of sky-high expenses and people quitting their jobs in droves, to the detriment of the economic system.

Proponents reject that, arguing people obviously want to be productive and that a basic profits couldgenuinely offer them greater flexibility to pick out the activities they discover most treasured.

for centuries this has been considered a utopia, however today it has not best grow to be feasible, butindispensible,” Ralph Kundig, one of the lead campaigners, told AFP.

the amount to be paid has yet to be decided, but the non-political group in the back of the initiative hasadvised paying 2,500 Swiss francs ($2,500/2,three hundred euros) a month to every person, and 625 francs for every toddler.

which can sound like a lot, however it’s far slightly enough to get through on in one of the world‘s priciest international locations — leaving masses of incentive to work, campaigners say.

authorities have anticipated an additional 25 billion francs would be wished annually to cover theexpenses, requiring deep spending cuts or steep tax hikes.

electorate sceptical

“The concept is noble, but I do not assume our society can afford it today,” Stephane Szeless, a 4512 monthsantique civil servant in Geneva, told AFP ahead of Sunday’s vote.

i am sceptical.”

Supporters of the initiative however suggest the UBI could replace a number other high priced social welfare programmes and will be without difficulty financed through moderate increases in sales tax orthru a small charge on electronic transactions.

there may be little danger of the initiative passing, however Kundig said that “just getting a wide public debate started out in this essential issue is a victory”.

several different contentious troubles are also being put to the vote underneath Switzerland’s gadget of direct democracy on Sunday, a number of that have a better risk of going via.

A recent gfs.bern ballot indicated that 60 percentage of citizens are in favour of a central authority notionto hurry up the united states‘s asylum manner.

The intention is for most instances to be treated inside a hundred and forty days or less, as comparedto a median of round 400 days in the mean time.

The Swiss can even vote on whether to permit genetic testing of embryos earlier than they are insertedwithin the uterus in cases of in vitro fertilisation where either discern consists of a severe hereditarydisease.

No screening might be approved for such things as gender, hair and eye shade, however that has now not stopped opponents from dubbing the initiative the “eugenics regulation“.

The final outcomes of Sunday’s vote have been predicted to be clear through early evening.

(This tale has not been edited by NDTV team of workers and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Swiss electorate Reject ‘money For not anything’ earnings Plan

Supporters had said introducing a monthly income of 2,500 Swiss francs per adult no matter how much they work would promote human dignity and public service.

Zurich/Bern: Swiss voters rejected by using a extensive margin on Sunday a proposal to introduce aguaranteed primary profits for absolutely everyone living within the wealthy u . s . a . after an uneasy debate approximately the future of labor at a time of increasing automation.

Supporters had stated introducing a monthly profits of two,500 Swiss francs ($2,563 or around Rs 1.7 lakh)in step with grownup and 625 francs per child under 18 no matter how plenty they paintings could sellhuman dignity and public carrier.

combatants, together with the government, said it would value too much and weaken the financial system.

Projections via the GFS polling outfit for Swiss broadcaster SRF showed almost 4 out of 5 citizensadversarial the formidable social test launched through Basel cafe owner Daniel Haeni and allies in a vote beneath the Swiss system of direct democracy.

Mr Haeni acknowledged defeat however claimed a ethical victory.

“As a businessman i’m a realist and had reckoned with 15 according to cent support, now it seems likegreater than 20 consistent with cent or perhaps even 25 in line with cent. I find that splendid and sensational,” he instructed SRF.

after I see the media hobby, from abroad as properly, then I say we’re placing a trend.”

Switzerland is the first united states to keep a country wide referendum on an unconditional basicearnings, however others which include Finland are analyzing similar plans as societies ponder a globalwherein robots replace human beings within the personnel.

Olivier, a 26-12 monthsvintage chippie who works on construction websites and runs a small enterprisewhere he designs and builds furnishings, stated he voted “sure” to the initiative.

“For me it’d be a tremendous possibility to place my recognition on my ardour and not go to work just for a living,” he stated.

Sustainable answer?

Champions of the plan had painted simply this kind of destiny in a poster larger than a football areaasking “What could you do if your earnings was cozy?” that they had also marched as robots down Zurich’s excessive avenue and had passed out loose 10-franc notes.

A Bern guy who gave his name only as Stephan said he supported the concept as a “sustainable solutionfor society”.

“I think people will pass on working because it is a human want to be useful, to do meaningful motion. In fact, i’ve the impression that human beings could be even more effective if they are productive by way of themselves in place of being obliged to be efficient,” he stated.

A girl named Meleanie said she reluctantly voted “no”.

“I discover that it is a actual chance that after humans simply get their basic desires covered societydoesn’t experience accountable anymore to look after the ones who can’t absolutely take care of thesituation on their own“, she stated.

Employers additionally heaved a sigh of comfort that Switzerland, wherein unemployment is simplestaround three.5 per cent, had not grow to be the first united states of america to include the sort ofpath-breaking degree.

The Swiss authorities had advised voters to reject the marketing campaign, saying the scheme mightcost an excessive amount of and undermine societal brotherly love.

The plan protected replacing in full or in component what people got from social blessings.

The government expected the notion would have price 208 billion Swiss francs a year, significantlyweakened the financial system and discouraged human beings, especially low earners, from working.

a great deal of the value could have been included via current social safety bills, but sharp spending cuts or tax will increase might have needed to make up a final gap of 25 billion.

a sophisticated social safety internet already supports individuals who can not pay themselves for theirlivelihood. Fewer than seven percentage of people lived in poverty in 2014, reliable statistics show.

In a separate vote on Sunday, Swiss citizens also truely rejected a suggestion to require nationmanagedcorporations, such as Swisscom, not to seek to make a earnings.

The government had warned that accepting the initiative might hurt the agencies‘ competitiveness and willcause higher taxes.