Huawei’s $eighty smartwatch is not really worth it

You take into account that adage approximately how if you need something cheap, fast and correct,you could best get two? i am too drunk to recall it properly, however Huawei’s doing its pleasant to tick allthree boxes with the honour Band Z1. it’s a wearable from the company‘s Honor sub-emblem that’sdesigned to appeal to tech-savvy, price rangeconscious consumers. it’s simply gone on sale in the US for $80 and, up front, it’s far an excessive amount of for a neat however badly carried out concept. Itmight be $20 less than the discounted OG Pebble and significantly more fashionable, but the experienceis so compromised that it is no longer really worth the ache.

Gallery: Huawei Honor Band Z1 | 10 pictures

+6
in many ways, the honor Band Z1 jogs my memory of similarbudget” smartwatches just like the first Pebble and Alcatel OneTouch’s in any other case anonymous Watch. Like the ones two, the Z1 is designed to run a custom operating machine and is constrained by way of contrast to its more high-priced rivals. further, the trio are considerably less expensive than the Apple Watch (which starts offevolved at $249) and most Android put on gadgets, which run for $250 or so. and that’s if you can pickup a good buy here and there. finally, all three are hampered with a few sort of compromise that remindsall people you can’t get a 7339ff1fc90882f8f31ca1efdd2ac191 price tag at a thirdelegance price.

i’m constantly leery approximately defining watches as “masculine” or “feminine,” due to the fact, whats up, it’s 2016 and we live in a greater enlightened age. it’s only a shame that most of the people who sawme wearing this device requested why i used to be wearing a female‘s watch. it is down to the fact that the Z1 has a dainty case and narrow strap, even as mybest=”hide”>massive=”hide”>big|huge|massive|large=”tipsBox”> forearms could be defined as whateverbut. it’s also very quite, with a spherical, 38mm body and a elegant metal bezel that catches the attention and feels ultramodern in a ’60s kind of way.
You can’t get a 7339ff1fc90882f8f31ca1efdd2ac191 price ticket at a thirdclass fee.
it’s a similar tale with the strap, that is crafted from thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), a flowery-schmancy elastic plastic it truly is proof against oil and harm. That said, it seems the white band is prettysusceptible to dye from my denims, which is why the images on this piece have a smudgy blue tint.earlier than i might even noticed, the strap’s diffused crosshatch texture changed into all at once veryvisible so, uh, sorry about that, oldsters. If i have every other objection, it is that the band is slender, to the point where it seems more secure on my pal‘s 14-12 monthsvintage daughter than it does on me.

in case you‘ve ever visible a Huawei Watch, exceptional=”hide”>you’ll be=”hide”>you will be|you’ll be|you may be=”tipsBox”> conscious that it and the Z1 were shot from the identical gun barrel; they even use theequal charging plate. The styling is wherein the comparisons end, however, because the flagship Androidput onbased totally model is robust, hypermasculine and… uh, the entirety the Z1 is not. The firm is already remedying this problem by means of freeing a jewel-encrusted alternative for girls, but the feemight be a wince-inducing $500. by contrast, the Z1 is paying homage to HTC’s Rhyme, the business enterprise‘s attempt to attraction to girls by launching a deeply compromised telephone with a purplepaint process.

one of the oldest hints in the cheap-smartwatch-layout e-book is to build one with a spherical case butplaced a smaller, square show interior it. unluckily, a great deal of the Z1’s real property is pure empty frippery, with a rectangular 1.06-inch 128 x 128 OLED touch panel wedged inside. i’m no longer qualifiedto say how it plays in vibrant daylight hoursas it‘s February in England — however it have to controlto warfare against the solar. must. I say that because, as you will spot inside the above image, the showis firing on all thrusters, and taking a seen image have become near impossible.

with a view to sip its as a substitute meager battery, the display will handiest turn on when it senses youraising your forearm. In idea, that is nice=”hide”>fine=”hide”>fine|great|excellent|first-rate|first-excellent|exceptional|nice|pleasant|quality|best|high-quality|satisfactory=”tipsBox”>, and at night it’s afunction you may without difficulty disable in case you‘d select that it only light up while you contactthe show. lamentably, it leaves you wide open for unintentional touches, even when you‘re asleep. morethan as soon as, i was woken by the glare of the display on my eyelids and so stopped the use of it for sleep-tracking after some days. If I had any other grievance, it’s that the watch only indicates the time for a fleeting momentif your eyes do not trap it, you have to faucet to get every other 3 seconds. Thenthere is the truth that a swipe is often incorrectly registered, main you down a rabbit hole of no … nope, no, no, that is not what I meant

All informed, the respect Band Z1 will tell you the time, what number of steps you have taken, how manyenergy you have burned and what kind of sleep you’ve got had. If, say, you go out for a run, you couldprompt a separate interesttracking mode with the intention to tell you the steps and energy for thatunique burst of attempt. The best different stand-on my own choice to be had at the tool is thepotential to change the face for considered one of 4 alternatives.

What separates this tool from a boggeneral fitness tracker, even though, is that you could studynotifications out of your smartphone. if you have a couple of textual content messages or WhatsApps,as an example, it’ll provide up a new icon on the menu to assist you to read those messages. unlike withdifferent devices, you not most effective get the preview however also can paw to and fro via the wholetext until you decide to dismiss it. similarly, you can pick out to push aside or mute your cellphone‘s ring when you get a name.

The Z1 also offers up idle reminders in case you‘ve been nevertheless for more than an hour, despite the fact that in exercise this doesn’t paintings that nicely. extra than as soon as i have been on foot up a flight of stairs most effective to be told that I wasn’t being active sufficient. Oh, and if your phone getsseparated from your body, the watch will ping with a littlemisplaced signal” alert that doubles as an ersatz Bluetooth tether.

The Z1 is hooked up to your smartphone via the Huawei wear app, which offers fundamental fitness– and sleep-tracking facilities. On the home display you will see a high-quality=”hide”>large=”hide”>big|huge|massive|large=”tipsBox”> circle, the rim of which step by step fills up with a block of colour the greater you flow (or sleep) that day. you can additionally tap to get entry to yourancient information and notice how many energy you have burned off or what nutrients that equates to.for instance, at the start of the day, high-quality=”hide”>you’ll be=”hide”>you will be|you’ll be|you may be=”tipsBox”> instructed what number of strawberries you may devour guilt-unfastened with the caloriesyou’ve burned off, for instance. past that, the app helps you to tweak some of the tool‘s capabilities, like activating or disabling push messages and idle reminders. but this is approximately it.

no longer having an always-on display means that the Z1 sips instead of gulps its 70mAh battery. In every week of testing, the device lasted nearly six days earlier than it had to move back at the charging plate.that’s the sort of primary requirement for battery life that many other smartwatches fail to satisfy. but — and it’s a great=”hide”>big=”hide”>big|huge|massive|large=”tipsBox”> but — the 32d flash while the showturns on is one of those compromises that without a doubt receives on your way. it’s meant to befashionable and easy but winds up demanding you, specially in case you‘re trying to passively informthe time.

when you study a gadget, one of the first questions you must ask yourself is, Which particular set ofhumans is that this designed for? due to the fact every so often what the organization meant and whattakes place in fact can range. as an instance, Huawei Honor advertising and marketing is chock-full ofyounger women, but i’d say they’re the incorrect group of people. To me, it does not comply with that ifsomething is fashionable, you will forgive it for being a shitty product, and certainly, from a tech attitude, the Z1 isn’t first-class=”hide”>great=”hide”>excellent|superb|great|outstanding|exceptional|brilliant|fantastic|terrific|awesome|wonderful|splendid|remarkable|extremely good|amazing|first-rate|tremendous|notable|first rate|top notch|extraordinary|high-quality|incredible|exquisite|super=”tipsBox”>.

The display is cheap, now not sufficient has been done to make it consumerpleasant and it can’t in anymanner compete with the Pebble, that is just $20 more costly. yes, the older watch is considerably uglier and no, it’s in no way going to attraction to those who don’t want to embrace the pocket-protector-and-glasses appearance. but thinking about how a great deal more you get for little or no greater and howunderwhelming the Z1 is, it is a slam dunk. perhaps you’d recall the Z1 when you have a small baby andwant her to have a “my first wearable” that isn’t always fabricated from yellow plastic. perhaps then, andhandiest then, is the Z1 worth buying, but even that’s a stretch.

Should alcohol limits for men and women really be the same?

The UK’s new alcohol guidelines advise that men and women shouldn’t drink more than 14 units of alcohol a week. Previous advice for the British drinker presented a higher threshold for men, so this represents a considerable change. So what was the evidence that the limits should not take gender into account?

Most countries that provide guidelines on alcohol consumption suggest higher threshold levels for men than women. It is well known that, physiologically, women are more vulnerable to the toxic effects of alcohol than men. Pint for pint, women have a greater risk of alcohol related problems such as dependency, certain cancers (liver, mouth and stomach) and other physical and psychological health issues.

A complex interplay of genetics, environment, personality and motivation contributes towards the likelihood of experiencing these conditions. The different risk factors faced by men and women are particularly apparent at higher levels of consumption – what we now call “drinking with increasing risk”. That is, men who regularly drink more than three or four units a day and women who regularly drink more than two or three units a day. But at levels of consumption lower than this, these differences are not as clear cut.

An acceptable risk

The latest guidelines are based on data provided by the University of Sheffield. It shows that anyone who drinks every day and who consumes no more than 14 units of alcohol a week has a less than one percent chance of dying from an alcohol-related health condition at any time.

One per cent was adopted by the guidelines committee as the maximum level of risk that would be acceptable to the public. This has been presented as a similar level of risk to the chance of dying in a car accident. (In fact, the chances of dying in a road accident are even smaller – at less than 0.5% over a lifetime.) But most people don’t drink every day and so, for the majority, the situation is a little less clear cut.

So it’s not just how much, but also how often, we drink that counts, with decreasing frequency associated with increased risk. The Sheffield data shows that men drinking 14 units a week on a single occasion have a 4.5% lifetime risk of dying from an alcohol-related health condition. For women drinking at the same level on a single occasion each week, the risk is 2%.

Interestingly, at the new guideline threshold, men have an almost five times (0.99%) greater risk of death than women (0.18%), but still less than 1% overall. If we consider the previous threshold of 21 units a week for men drinking seven days a week, the risk of alcohol-related death increases to 3%. Complicated, isn’t it?

The new guidelines present the message that there is no “safe” level of alcohol consumption but stop short of recommending abstention as the best policy. In fact, the Sheffield data shows that for both men and women drinking up to seven units a week, spread across three or more days, actually has a protective effect on death from an alcohol-related health condition. For men the benefit is very small (a 0.1% improvement), compared with over 2% for women.

A better way to present the data

Given that there are well established and significant differences between male and female responses to alcohol across a range of quantities and frequencies of consumption, it is difficult if not impossible to encompass this diversity into a single recommendation of what represents the optimal limits of consumption with regard to the likelihood of dying from an alcohol related condition.

It might be better to present information on the relative risks associated with increasing use. This allows a comparison with non-drinkers, for example: “Men who regularly drink five units a day have a threefold increased risk of death from cirrhosis of the liver compared with non-drinkers.” In fact, the expert committee that helped to put the guidelines together noted that this might have been a better way to illustrate the relationship between drinking and death.

The situation is complex. Although it’s clear that there are benefits to both health and society by reducing alcohol consumption, the reasoning behind the cut-off of 1%, as an acceptable level of risk, or the underlying assumption that those who drink do so on a daily basis, is unclear.

While the guidelines set out to provide helpful advice about drinking, ignoring the differences between male and female responses to alcohol, is a risky strategy. If the guidelines don’t resonate with those of us who choose to drink, they will simply be ignored, and that won’t do anyone any good at all.

[“source-Scroll”]

Can your idea really become a business?

Starting a business is very motivating yet an emotional roller-coaster ride. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint

Starting a business is very motivating yet an emotional roller-coaster ride. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint

With the start-up scenario growing and becoming pervasive in India, entrepreneurs are bubbling with new ideas, believing their idea to be the next billion-dollar one. Today, it feels as though everyone wants to be an entrepreneur. This is very heartening for a young country like India where, by 2020, 64% of our population will be of working age, highlighting the urgency for future employment creation.

The biggest challenge facing global start-ups is the high rate of failure. According to Harvard Business Review, over 80% of global start-ups fail in the first 18 months, and in India this figure is close to an alarming 90%. The ministry of corporate affairs in fiscal 2014 published that close to 100,000 new companies were registered in India, but how many of them will survive? It appears that when signs of trouble arise, many founders struggle to “save” the business, largely due to poor decision-making by the leader, and a lack of guidance from a skilled expert.

Hence, the big question now is—how do we ensure more than 5% of start-ups succeed? While the government and private sectors are working overtime to improve the ecosystem for start-ups, there is a larger, more fundamental question that needs to be asked: Are start-ups working on “an idea” that can become a business? How can they assess whether their idea is scalable, can generate sales and will attract funding? Or whether it is a lifestyle business, which has limited growth potential but still has capacity to be revenue positive?

GrowthEnabler was recently approached by the founder of an adventure sport business, who sold exclusive, high-value, luxury equipment to sporting adventurers, but was struggling with monthly cash flow, and losing money every month. With poor sales, a high monthly rental outgoing for their prominently placed high-street store and a very niche target market, this business showed limited potential to survive.

Enthralled by their exciting idea, this founder had neglected the key challenges to his business, firstly the adventure market is very niche, and within this niche market, there is limited demand for high end, and high-priced sporting gear, particularly on the high street. This is a lifestyle business—its high street location (unsurprisingly) could not achieve enough footfall to generate sales to cover rental payment, let alone growth the business and make a profit.

Starting a business is very motivating yet an emotional roller-coaster ride. Many have sacrificed the comfort of salaried jobs, risked career changes, and parted with existing businesses to start new ventures, aspiring to become a successful entrepreneur.

GrowthEnabler client Sahil Kukreja gave up his day job as a cricketer and has built a start-up in the health and fitness sector called Fiticket—a gym and studio aggregation business with its own currency. Today, only 0.1% of Indians use a gym, and sector growth is projected at 20%, which means even if only 1% of Indians begin using gyms and studios, this business has huge growth potential.

Equipped with a “can do” mindset and a “unique” idea, many entrepreneurs leap to search funds for their business, often prematurely. However, how many founders are confident they have thoroughly done all their homework and are equipped with expertise and experience to make informed decisions for their business? The 90% failure rate surely indicates the answer.

Hence, let us begin focusing on step 1 of the entrepreneurial journey—the question you need to ask yourselves before you take the plunge: Is your idea a business or a hobby?

Step 1

Business or Hobby: Many entrepreneurs who are obsessed with finding the next big “unique” idea are, however, not quite as obsessed with understanding the compelling need for their idea and identifying why people “need” or would “want” to buy it.

Potential clients need to know your product exists, why it is unique and why they should buy it.

Assess four areas to validate whether your idea is a business:

1) What is your special value proposition? Are you solving a compelling need? Is some else already solving it? If yes, what is so special about your product, why will customers come and buy from you?

2) Is your idea better than existing products in the market? Have you completed a comparative analysis of the product? Ask yourself, is your product cheaper, better or faster than what exists in the market today?

3) Is this a scalable business or lifestyle business? Look at the size of market and ask yourself, “Can I grow the business into one that will turn over millions of dollars?” Note, if the market is niche than it becomes more of a lifestyle business, i.e., it has growth potential, however, this growth is limited.

4) Have you got feedback on your idea from experienced experts? Speak to those who have taken this journey. Ask for their feedback. Get some guidance.

Your first idea does not have to be the best idea. Don’t worry if it’s not workable. If the idea is going to fail, let it fail fast. This experience would be the gained knowledge to better the next idea.

[“source-Livemint”]