India in Australia: CA XI Bowlers To Share Insights With Men in Blue

Virat Kohli Manchester Reuters

Adelaide: Five bowlers of the Cricket Australia XI, against whom India played a couple of two-day games as a warm-up to the Test series, will stay here to assist the national side and provide insights into the visiting team.

The second practice match finished in an inevitable draw on Friday, but CA XI captain Ashton Turner is among five bowlers from the team that will remain here to assist the national team in the nets.

“Players would probably be talking about what they saw and did, which will be passed onto other players,” CA XI coach Troy Cooley was quoted as saying by Australian news agency AAP.

“It’s a great little network of information being transferred. We’ll make sure the most up to date information is given to our big brother,” he said.

Leg-spinner Jonte Pattison, pacemen Sam Rainbird, David Moody and Josh Lalor are expected to stay in Adelaide along with Turner.

Left-armer Lalor snared four wickets in the tour match, often troubling India’s batsmen. Opposition analysis has hardly been at the top of

Australia coach Darren Lehmann’s priority list in the past week, given the tragic death of Phillip Hughes. Lehmann’s focus over the next few days will be ensuring his 13-man squad is ready to take the field at Adelaide Oval on Tuesday.

“We’ll have a look at India of course, but at the moment’s it’s a case of getting our things right first,” Lehmann said prior to the squad’s session today.

Assistant coach Ali de Winter attended the tour game last week, when paceman Varun Aaron sent down some impressive spells.

“He’s got some notes for Boof to take away,” Cooley said.

“There’s plenty of information for the boys, obviously India’s series in England earlier this year. We’ll just top it up with a little bit of stuff from there,” he said.

[“source-ndtv”]

wealthy individuals consider old white men the maximum

rich old white guy

Horse Racing – Royal Ascot – Ascot Racecourse – A racegoer reads the newspaper, June 16, 2015
FA Insights is a each day publication from commercial enterprise Insider that grants the pinnacleinformation and remark for monetary advisors.
wealthy individuals believe old white guys the most for economic recommendation (InvestmentNews)

A Spectrem organization survey observed that when individuals with $100,000 to $5 million to make investments were asked to pick a economic adviser primarily based most effective on a photo of 8human beings (four women and 4 guys), approximately one-third of them decided on the older white male, reviews Liz Skinner.

the percentage turned into even extra when buyers had extra investable property: approximately forty%of these with $five million or greater selected the older white male.

whether or not you take a look at the responses from adult males versus females, or amongexceptional age cuts, or maybe amongst various ethnicities, the older white male turned into the only thegreatest percent picked,” stated Randy Wostratzky, a director at research company Spectremorganization.

three motives why you should not freak out approximately China just but (The BlackRock weblog)

although most oldsters are pessimistic approximately China, BlackRock’s Terry Simpson delineates threemotives why we should not freak out approximately it simply yet.

China’s debt stage is a problemhowever it’s now not at an drawing close debt-crisis degree.
The chinese financial system still has the capacity to develop, although it might not be within thedouble-digit charges anymore.
Policymakers understand what needs to be accomplished in terms of implementing reforms.
backside line: don’t give up at the chinese language economic system and chinese language equitiessimply yet, but be organized for marketplace volatility as China’s new chapter is written,” argued Simpson.

here‘s wherein people are moving in the US (business Insider)

the use of the Census Bureau’s today’s estimates, enterprise Insider’s Andy Kiersz created a map showinginternet domestic migration between July 2014 and July 2015 as a percentage of the 2014 population inthe united states‘s huge towns.

maximum of the kingdom‘s metro regions noticed net bad migration, proven in crimson at the map, at the same time as some metro regions, specially inside the South, had greater human beings circulate in than go away, indicated in blue:

metro area domestic migration thumb
enterprise Insider/Andy Kiersz, data from US Census Bureau

scholar debt is an obstacle for millennial buyers (FA magazine)

a new look at from the Plan Sponsor Council of the usa (%), a Chicago-primarily based now not-for-profitrepresenting company sponsors of retirement plans, determined that 27% of retirement plan sponsors saida “slight variety” of millennial personnel have referred to pupil loan debt as an obstacle to saving.

furthermore, nine% stated hearing a “excessive degree” of millennials complaining approximatelystudent loans, reports Christopher Robbins.

There are a gaggle of various strategies advisors can use to entice prosperous clients (monetarymaking plans)

John J. Bowen Jr., the CEO of CEG worldwide, mentioned several techniques that advisers can use to lureaffluent customers. among the techniques he recommends are telling your private tale, tapping into social media, and providing yourself as a resource.

these techniques do not rely upon conventional marketing or advertising. instead, they use emotion and fascination to place advisers as cross-to professionals of their markets,” he wrote. “They leveragepresent relationships in innovative methods to assist advisers get extra introductions to new prospects.and that they use era to assist advisers reach out to the exact types of clients they’re searching for.”

Should alcohol limits for men and women really be the same?

The UK’s new alcohol guidelines advise that men and women shouldn’t drink more than 14 units of alcohol a week. Previous advice for the British drinker presented a higher threshold for men, so this represents a considerable change. So what was the evidence that the limits should not take gender into account?

Most countries that provide guidelines on alcohol consumption suggest higher threshold levels for men than women. It is well known that, physiologically, women are more vulnerable to the toxic effects of alcohol than men. Pint for pint, women have a greater risk of alcohol related problems such as dependency, certain cancers (liver, mouth and stomach) and other physical and psychological health issues.

A complex interplay of genetics, environment, personality and motivation contributes towards the likelihood of experiencing these conditions. The different risk factors faced by men and women are particularly apparent at higher levels of consumption – what we now call “drinking with increasing risk”. That is, men who regularly drink more than three or four units a day and women who regularly drink more than two or three units a day. But at levels of consumption lower than this, these differences are not as clear cut.

An acceptable risk

The latest guidelines are based on data provided by the University of Sheffield. It shows that anyone who drinks every day and who consumes no more than 14 units of alcohol a week has a less than one percent chance of dying from an alcohol-related health condition at any time.

One per cent was adopted by the guidelines committee as the maximum level of risk that would be acceptable to the public. This has been presented as a similar level of risk to the chance of dying in a car accident. (In fact, the chances of dying in a road accident are even smaller – at less than 0.5% over a lifetime.) But most people don’t drink every day and so, for the majority, the situation is a little less clear cut.

So it’s not just how much, but also how often, we drink that counts, with decreasing frequency associated with increased risk. The Sheffield data shows that men drinking 14 units a week on a single occasion have a 4.5% lifetime risk of dying from an alcohol-related health condition. For women drinking at the same level on a single occasion each week, the risk is 2%.

Interestingly, at the new guideline threshold, men have an almost five times (0.99%) greater risk of death than women (0.18%), but still less than 1% overall. If we consider the previous threshold of 21 units a week for men drinking seven days a week, the risk of alcohol-related death increases to 3%. Complicated, isn’t it?

The new guidelines present the message that there is no “safe” level of alcohol consumption but stop short of recommending abstention as the best policy. In fact, the Sheffield data shows that for both men and women drinking up to seven units a week, spread across three or more days, actually has a protective effect on death from an alcohol-related health condition. For men the benefit is very small (a 0.1% improvement), compared with over 2% for women.

A better way to present the data

Given that there are well established and significant differences between male and female responses to alcohol across a range of quantities and frequencies of consumption, it is difficult if not impossible to encompass this diversity into a single recommendation of what represents the optimal limits of consumption with regard to the likelihood of dying from an alcohol related condition.

It might be better to present information on the relative risks associated with increasing use. This allows a comparison with non-drinkers, for example: “Men who regularly drink five units a day have a threefold increased risk of death from cirrhosis of the liver compared with non-drinkers.” In fact, the expert committee that helped to put the guidelines together noted that this might have been a better way to illustrate the relationship between drinking and death.

The situation is complex. Although it’s clear that there are benefits to both health and society by reducing alcohol consumption, the reasoning behind the cut-off of 1%, as an acceptable level of risk, or the underlying assumption that those who drink do so on a daily basis, is unclear.

While the guidelines set out to provide helpful advice about drinking, ignoring the differences between male and female responses to alcohol, is a risky strategy. If the guidelines don’t resonate with those of us who choose to drink, they will simply be ignored, and that won’t do anyone any good at all.

[“source-Scroll”]